Williams v. Luxottica Retail North America Inc.

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e) that an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith, therefore DENYING plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply toproceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 1/30/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Charles Williams, Plaintiff(s), vs. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., Defendant(s). : : : : : : : : : Case Number: 1:16cv888 Judge Susan J. Dlott ORDER This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on September 9, 2016 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5). The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e) that an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith, therefore DENYING plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Callihan v Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6th Cir. 1997). IT IS SO ORDERED. ___s/Susan J. Dlott___________ Judge Susan J. Dlott United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?