Pullen v. Conschafsky et al

Filing 96

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 93 Report and Recommendation; Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice against defendants Cool, Davis,Erdos, Ford, Goodman, Mahlman, Nolan, Parsons, Prise, and Toppins for want of prosecution and for failure to obey an Order of the Court. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/14/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Gary Lee Pullen,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 1:16cv894

Correctional Officer Conschafsky, et al.,

Judge Michael R. Barrett

Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed
by the Magistrate Judge on November 20, 2018 (Doc. 93).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C),
including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file
objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v.
Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R
(Doc. 93) have been filed.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 93) of the Magistrate Judge is
hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge,
plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice against defendants Cool, Davis,
Erdos, Ford, Goodman, Mahlman, Nolan, Parson, Prise, and Toppins for want of
prosecution and for failure to obey an Order of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett
Michael R. Barrett, Judge
United States District Court
1