McDougald v. Eaches et al

Filing 58

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' MOTIONS 28 & 51 for Summary Judgment be Granted. It is Ordered that plaintiff's 56 Motions to amend and 55 supplement his response in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judg ment are Granted; plaintiff's 37 & 54 MOTIONS to supplement his response in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment are Denied; Plaintiff's 57 MOTION to proceed to judgment is Denied as Moot. The parties, within (2 0) days of the filing of this Order, Show Cause why summary judgment should not be granted for defendants on plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim as it appears there is no causal connection between defendant Eaches' use of pepper s pray and any protected conduct by plaintiff. ( Objections to R&R due by 8/31/2018.) Parties Show Cause Response due by 9/6/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/17/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)