Pal v. Jeff et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: All claims contained in plaintiffs complaint are dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e). It is further ordered that plaintiff is to be admonished a second time not to file any ne w complaint in this Court that raises claims identical or similar claims to those that have already been filed. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 1/30/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Leslie P. Pal, Plaintiff(s), vs. Dude Jeff, et al., Defendant(s). : : : : : : : : : Case Number: 1:16cv914 Judge Susan J. Dlott ORDER This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on September 12, 2016 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5). The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, all claims contained in plaintiff’s complaint are dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e). It is further ordered that plaintiff is to be admonished a second time not to file any new complaint in this Court that raises claims identical or similar claims to those that have already been filed. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___s/Susan J. Dlott___________ Judge Susan J. Dlott United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?