Woods v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 08/31/2017. the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 13) be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; and that because this Court lacks jurisdiction in this matter involving a successive habeas petition, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b), respondents motion to transfer the petition (Doc. 7) be, and hereby is, GRANTED and that the petition(Doc.1) is TRANSFERRED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1631 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for review and determination as to whether the District Court may consider the successive claims for relief. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-922 (WOB-KLL) JEFFERY WOODS VS. PETITIONER JUDGMENT WARDEN, MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION RESPONDENT This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 13), and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by Petitioner (Doc. 15), and the Court being sufficiently advised, IT IS ORDERED that the objections (Doc. 15) to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) be, and hereby are, overruled. That the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 13) be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; and that because this Court lacks jurisdiction in this matter involving a successive habeas petition, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b), respondent’s motion to transfer the petition (Doc. 7) be, and hereby is, GRANTED and that the petition(Doc.1) is TRANSFERRED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1631 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for review and determination as to whether the District Court may consider the successive claims for relief. This 31st day of August, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?