Harouna-Konate v. U.S. Attorney General et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 13 Report and Recommendations. Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction 12 be granted and the petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 be denied. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 4/10/2017. (ss)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.,
Case No. 1:16-cv-982
Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman
DECISION AND ENTRY
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 10)
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United
States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the
Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on March 10, 2017,
submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 10). Following the Report and
Recommendation, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction on April
5, 2017, informing the Court that Petitioner had been deported. (Doc. 12). The
Magistrate Judge submitted a supplemental Report and Recommendations on April 7,
2017. (Doc. 13).
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo
all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court agrees
with the Report and Recommendation that this civil action is now moot following
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 12) be
GRANTED and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) be DENIED. The
Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case shall be CLOSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?