Malone v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 30

DECISION AND ENTRY adopting Report and Recommendations re 29 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 10/14/2020. (rrs)

Download PDF
Case: 1:16-cv-01004-TSB-SKB Doc #: 30 Filed: 10/14/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 1648 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COURTNEY MALONE, Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:16-cv-1004 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 29) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on September 29, 2020, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 29). No objections were filed. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29) should be and is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety. Accordingly, for the reasons stated above: 1) Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for attorney’s fees (Doc. 26) is GRANTED as the requested fee is within the 25% statutory cap on fee awards and is otherwise reasonable. Case: 1:16-cv-01004-TSB-SKB Doc #: 30 Filed: 10/14/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 1649 2) Plaintiff’s counsel SHALL be awarded the additional net fee of $556.50 under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). 3) Plaintiff’s fourth motion for extension of time (Doc. 25) is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 10/14/2020 s/Timothy S. Black Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?