McDougald v. Dillow et al

Filing 80

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 68 79 Report and Recommendations denying 63 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; denying 65 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; denying 67 Motion for Leave to Appeal in form a pauperis; denying 69 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 73 Motion. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 5/6/19. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Jerone McDougald,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 1:16cv1099

Michael Dillow, et al.,

Judge Michael R. Barrett

Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed
by the Magistrate Judge on February 26, 2019 (Doc. 79).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C),
including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file
objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v.
Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R
(Doc. 79) have been filed.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 79) of the Magistrate Judge is
hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge,
plaintiff/appellants Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 63, 65, 67)
are DENIED. Plaintiff/appellants Motion to Amend (Doc. 69) is also DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett
Michael R. Barrett, Judge
United States District Court

1