Pettus-Brown v. Hamilton County Ohio et al

Filing 5

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 2 Report and Recommendation dismissing 1 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 2/13/17. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION LaShawn R. Pettus-Brown, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:17cv032 Hamilton County, Ohio, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on January 23, 2017 (Doc. 2). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff’s pleading entitled "Bill in Chancery/Equity and Injunctive Relief" (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice, with the caveat that the dismissal may not be construed as precluding plaintiff from filing a habeas petition challenging any conviction or sentence he may receive in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Case No. B1605805 after he has exhausted all available state-court remedies. 1 Any request for certificate of appealability or request to certify an appeal would not be taken in good faith and would be denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?