McDougald v. Erdos et al
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : Plaintiffs claims against defendants Erdos and Cool, and all defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to §28 U.S.C. §§1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1).Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 7/21/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Jerone McDougald,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Warden Ron Drdos, et al.,
Defendant(s).
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case Number: 1:17cv95
Judge Susan J. Dlott
ORDER
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate
Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the
pleadings and filed with this Court on March 9, 2017 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6).
Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered
de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does
determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s claims against defendants Erdos and Cool, and all defendants in
their official capacities are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to §28 U.S.C. §§1915(e)(2)(B) and
1915A(b)(1).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___s/Susan J. Dlott___________
Judge Susan J. Dlott
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?