Helm v. Warden, North Central Corectional Complex

Filing 13

JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of theMagistrate Judge (Doc. 12) be, and it hereby is, adopted as thefindings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court;petitioners Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 3), is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 7/31/2018. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-cv-329(WOB-MRM)
TONY HELM

PETITIONER

VS.

JUDGMENT

WARDEN, NORTH CENTRAL
CORRRECTIONAL COMPLEX
This

matter

is

RESPONDENT
before

the

Court

on

the

Report

and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 12),
and no objections having been filed thereto, and the Court being
sufficiently advised,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge (Doc. 12) be, and it hereby is, adopted as the
findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court;
petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 3), is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A
certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to the
claims alleged in the petition. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(a)(3), any application by petitioner to proceed on appeal
in forma pauperis would be not be taken in “good faith.”
This 31st day of July, 2018.