Harris et al v. Cooley et al

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the MagistrateJudge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Default (Doc. 21) is GRANTED IN PART. The Clerk shall enter defa ult against Defendants Daniel Cooley and Kaylay Cooley. The Motion (Doc. 21) is DENIED without prejudice to review as to Defendant Spraughe consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Default (Doc. 23) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 10/26/2018. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Franklin David Jr Harris, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No. 1:17cv540

Daniel Cooley, et al.,

Judge Michael R. Barrett

Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the
Magistrate Judge on September 24, 2018 (Doc. 24).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including
notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report
and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.
1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Default (Doc. 21) is GRANTED
IN PART. The Clerk shall enter default against Defendants Daniel Cooley and Kaylay
Cooley. The Motion (Doc. 21) is DENIED without prejudice to review as to Defendant
Spraughe consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Entry of Default (Doc. 23) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett
Michael R. Barrett, Judge
United States District Court
1