Abdulai Bundu v. Attorney General et al
Filing
14
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 11 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/18/18. (jlm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
KAMARA ABDULAI BUNDU,
Petitioner,
vs.
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 1:17-cv-612
Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman
DECISION AND ENTRY
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 11)
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to
United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the
Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on January 4, 2018,
submitted a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 11). No objections were filed.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo
all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does
determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its
entirety. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1) Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief
may be granted.
2) Plaintiff’s motion for a stay of removal (Doc. 6) is DENIED;
3) The Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal of this Order
would not be taken in good faith and therefore Plaintiff is denied leave to appeal in
forma pauperis;
1
4) The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is
TERMINATED in this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________________
_
________________________
Timothy S. Black
h
Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge
Date: 5/18/18
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?