Cornett v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
Filing
11
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendationsre 10 Report and Recommendation; Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on the ground that the petition is time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 11/13/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Antwon Cornett,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 1:17cv624
Warden, London
Correctional Institution,
Judge Michael R. Barrett
Respondent.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the
Magistrate Judge on October 19, 2018 (Doc. 10).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including
notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report
and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.
1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 10) have been filed.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 10) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby
ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Petitioner's
Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2254 on the ground that the petition is time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).
1
Any request for certificate of appealability or request to certify an appeal would not be
taken in good faith and would be denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett
Michael R. Barrett, Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?