Robinson v. Neil
Filing
46
ORDER granting 43 Motion to approve settlement agreement. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 6/27/18. (wam)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
SAMUEL ROBINSON, ET AL.
Plaintiffs,
: Case No. 1:17-cv-652
: Judge Susan J. Dlott
vs.
: Magistrate Judge Litkovitz
HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF
JIM NEIL
: ORDER APPROVING
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
:
Defendant
:
This case came before the Court for a hearing as required by Fed. Civ. R. 23(e)(2)
to determine whether a proposed class settlement was fair, reasonable, and adequate.
The hearing was held in Courtroom B of the Hamilton County Justice Center because
the class members were inmates in the jail, which is part of that facility. At the hearing,
counsel for the parties provided the Court with information concerning the factual
setting in which the case arose. Counsel informed the Court that the parties exchanged
a vast amount of information. Counsel also provided the Court with relevant
information regarding the class members, the settlement negotiations, the settlement
terms, the notice provided to class members, the benefit to class members, why the
settlement was fair, reasonable, and adequate, and the compensation and attorneys’
fees. In addition, seven objectors where present at the hearing. One, Tionna Davenport,
on advice of counsel in her criminal case, chose not to testify and was excused from the
hearing in its early stages.
Findings by the Court
Based upon the presentations of counsel and hearing testimony of the inmates
filing objections, the Court makes the following findings of fact:
I.
Summary of Case
The factual predicate for this case actually began with the 2008 financial crisis
that led to the Hamilton County Sheriff closing the Queens Gate Correctional Facility
that housed 800 inmates. In order to control the population, a series of release policies
were adopted by then Sheriff Simon Leis, some of which were not authorized by Ohio
law.
In June 2017, the number of inmates in the Hamilton County Justice Center
spiked to 1,611 inmates. The current sheriff, Jim Neil, was forced to house inmates on
temporary beds, more commonly called “boats,” in the two gymnasiums in the
Hamilton County Justice Center. This caused security and safety concerns, difficulty in
locating inmates for distribution of medication and provision of medical care, difficulty
with the provision of toilet facilities, and inadequate telephone access to inmates. About
the same time, following the closure of the Queens Gate Correctional Facility, the Ohio
courts had found some of the adopted release policies violated Ohio law.
Major Ketteman, the director of jail operations in the Hamilton County Justice
Center, authored a letter on June 14, 2017, declaring an emergency under Ohio law and
articulated the overcrowding issues outlined above. Major Ketteman documented a
cascade of consequences caused by overcrowding that Plaintiffs contend violate class
members rights as protected by the Eighth Amendment to the constitution. (See Doc. 8-
2
1, Page ID# 49-52, Ketteman Memorandum, June 14, 2017.) This declaration of
emergency allowed Sheriff Neil to directly draw funds from the Hamilton County
Auditor without an appropriation by the Hamilton County Board of County
Commissioners, to pay for housing inmates in jail facilities located in other Ohio
counties.
In September 2017, inmate Samuel Robinson filed a grievance, complaining that
he had a medical condition preventing him from using a boat. This led to a class action
complaint being filed on September 28, 2017, asserting, inter alia, that overcrowding at
HCJC was causing class members to suffer conditions of confinement that violated their
right not to be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment as protected by the Eighth
Amendment to the United States Constitution. (Doc. 1, Page ID# 1) Two amended
complaints adding named inmates and alleging the same unconstitutional conditions
were filed thereafter. (Doc. 10, Page ID# 74, First Amended Complaint; Doc. 12-1, Page
ID# 99, Second Amended Complaint.) Sheriff Neil filed an Answer on January 10, 2018
and opposed class certification.
The Parties disputed whether unconstitutional
conditions of confinement, similar to those outlined in the Ketteman Memorandum,
continued after suit was filed, prompting an agreement to mediate.
The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Litkovitz for the sole purpose of
conducting a settlement conference on December 5, 2017. After numerous conferences
with Magistrate Judge Litkovitz and meetings between counsel for Inmate Robinson
and Sheriff Neil, a proposed settlement was agreed upon by counsel for the parties. On
May 11, 2018, the Court certified the Class, preliminarily approved the Class settlement,
3
ordered notice to be sent to Class members, and set a hearing on fairness,
reasonableness, and adequacy of the proposed settlement.
During the time period between the Ketteman Memorandum of June 14, 2017
and the Parties agreeing upon the Proposed Settlement Agreement numerous changes
took place in the physical make up and the operational procedures used in the
Hamilton County Justice Center. These included:
a) 25 inmates were transferred to the jail in Butler County, Ohio;
b) 119 additional jail beds were purchased and installed in order to make all cells
in the Hamilton County Justice Center, double cells;
c) The boats, when needed, were distributed into pods the 16 and 24 cell pods in
the Hamilton County Justice Center instead of being collected in the gymnasiums;
d) Further, the boats were numbered to make locating a particular inmate for
medication and medical care much easier;
e) The telephone system was modified to add telephones, to limit telephone calls
to 20 minutes, and to lock out the most recent user so other inmates would have an
opportunity to use the telephones;
f) The classification system (the one used by Sheriff Neil and his predecessor is
approved by the National Institute of Corrections) was used for both cell and boat
assignments;
g) The sheriff and the labor union representing corrections officers agreed to
increase staffing by one additional corrections officer per floor when boats are in use;
4
h) Additional toilets were scheduled to be installed in the 16 and 24 cell pods that
house inmates on boats; and,
i) Naphcare, the medical services provider for the Hamilton County Justice
Center, began screening inmates to make certain there would be no physical
impediment to the inmate being housed in a boat.
v) The parties agree that Dr. James Austin shall be appointed as the Court’s expert
witness and shall report to the Court on (a) whether the classification system employed by the
Sheriff is being properly implemented by the Sheriff, (b) to evaluate the current release programs
and protocols set out in this Consent Decree and to determine whether additional release policies
and/or protocols should be ordered by the Court to alleviate overcrowding, and (c) to recommend
any other action which the Sheriff could take to alleviate overcrowding in the jail, including an
assessment of the adequacy of the Justice Center to house the offender population of Hamilton
County that should properly be incarcerated rather than released by the Sheriff. The Sheriff shall
provide the expert with such information as necessary for Dr. Austin to advise the Court on these
subjects. The costs of Dr. Austin’s work shall be borne by the Sheriff in an amount not to
exceed $30,000.00.
II.
The Class
The Class consists of all current and future inmates in the Hamilton County
Justice Center during the time period the settlement is effective. There are two parts of
the Class. First, “Population Inmates” are those who have had an initial appearance
before a judge who are held pending trial or held serving a sentence. Population
inmates are held for longer periods of time that may span several months. The second
5
part of the class is “Detention Inmates”, who are inmates that have not appeared before
a judge and may only be held for 48 hours. (Doc. 34, Page ID# 295)
III.
The Settlement Negotiations
The settlement negotiations centered upon: (a) limiting the use of boats for each
inmate; (b) limiting the number and locations of boats; (c) classifying inmates who may
be assigned to boats; (d) limiting the number of inmates in the Hamilton County Justice
Center; (e) remedies if the number of inmates exceed the limitation on the number of
inmates in the Hamilton County Justice Center; (f) continuing the release policies
initiated after the closure of the Queens Gate Correctional Facility; (g) providing for an
expert to evaluate the classification system and release policies; (h) the prospect of
additional jail space being provided; and, (i) screening inmates for physical
impairments prior to a boat assignment being made. There were six in-person
conferences with Magistrate Judge Litkovitz and two telephone conferences with
Magistrate Judge Litkovitz. The parties exchanged numerous proposals and had several
telephone and in-person meetings without Magistrate Judge Litkovitz. Sheriff Neil
opened the Hamilton County Justice Center for tours by counsel and court personnel,
and authorized access to his staff for interviews by Plaintiffs’ counsel.
IV.
Settlement Terms
The result of the negotiations described above resolved the issues as follows.
(a) No Population Inmate may be assigned to a boat for more than 5 consecutive
days in a month.
6
(b) The use of boats for Population Inmates is limited to 4 in each 16-cell pod and
6 in each 24-bed pod. No boats may be used in the Mental Health Unit or
Medical Unit.
(c) The classification system will be used for Population Inmates both in cells
and on boats.
(d) The problem with limiting inmates in the Hamilton County Justice System to
a fixed number is that the classification system dictates how many single cell
placements are required. In examining boat use, it was demonstrated that
sometimes boats are required when the number of inmates is 1,350. Other
times, no boats are needed when the total number of inmates exceeds 1,400.
In order to maximize use of the Hamilton County Justice Center and to
protect the inmates from overcrowding, the parties agreed that the
classification system will be used to control population. When the population
requires that the boats be used in excess of use formula set out in items (a)
and (b) above, the sheriff is required to take immediate remedial action set
out in item (e) below.
(e) The sheriff, should the limit be reached, shall: (1) send additional inmates to
jail facilities in other Ohio counties; (2) utilize the pretrial release program
without the limitations set by the bond imposed by the Municipal or
Common Pleas Courts; (3) do both remedies (1) and (2); or (4) stop admitting
inmates into the Hamilton County Justice Center and seek further relief from
this Court.
7
(f) The sheriff is authorized to continue utilizing his 7 release policies, including
those that may violate Ohio law.
(g) The county administrator agreed to provide the amount of $ 30,000 to hire an
expert for the Court, Dr. Austin, to make recommendations concerning the
classification system and the current release policies.
(h) The Hamilton County Board of County Commissioners is planning to
authorize conversion of administrative space into additional housing for
inmates within the Hamilton County Justice Center. Therefore, the length of
this agreement is limited to two (2) years, so that the effect of the conversion
of administrative space to housing space on overcrowding can be evaluated
and the need to continue this order determined.
(i) The medical care provider, NaphCare, already screened all incoming inmates
for medical issues and whether they have an impairment that prevents the
inmate from climbing stairs. NaphCare agreed to extend the screening
process to determine whether an incoming inmate had a physical impairment
preventing a boat assignment. If such impairment exists, the inmate will not
be assigned to a Boat.
V.
Notice Given to Class Members
Notice of the Class Settlement was broadcast on the in-house Hamilton County
Justice Center television for all inmates starting at 1500 hours on May 15, 2018, and ran
through May 16, 2018, at 1500 hours. This notice was broadcast every hour for five
minutes, in order to give the inmates sufficient time to read it. The notice was delivered
8
to Butler County (25 Inmates), Southwestern Ohio Developmental Center (1 inmate),
University Hospital (3 inmates), and Summit Behavioral Health Center (47 inmates). In
addition, on May 15, at 2400 hours, through May 16, at 2400 hours, a copy of the notice
was given to every prisoner being brought into the Hamilton County Justice Center.
Concurrently, on May 15, at 2400 hours, a copy of the notice was given to every inmate
housed at the Hamilton County Justice Center (1,498 inmates), Reading Road (142
inmates) and Woodburne (37 inmates) facilities. A total of 1,753 paper notices were
delivered to inmates in the Hamilton County Justice Center.
If the settlement is approved by the Court, a second notice of the rights of the
inmates and terms of the settlement will be posted in the Hamilton County Justice
Center in various pods and distributed to inmates along with other Hamilton County
Justice Center Information.
VI.
Benefit of Settlement to Class Members
The initial benefit to Class members is that conditions will improve at the
Hamilton County Justice Center immediately, rather than at the end of protracted
litigation. For all inmates, the release programs will continue to remain in place. No one
with a physical impairment will be assigned to a boat, and boat assignments will not
exceed 7 consecutive days in a month. (The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals previously
held that an inmate sleeping for seven days on the floor in a jail with a blanket was not
an eighth amendment violation.) Finally, if the number of inmates exceeds the formula
set out for boat use as determined by the classification system, there is a failsafe system
9
of additional releases or closing the jail to the admission of additional inmates and
allowing the Court to provide further relief.
For Population Inmates, the locations of boats are now limited to the 4 boats in a
16-cell pod and 6 boats in a 24-cell pod, and boat assignments are made through the
classification system. Further, there is one additional corrections officer on each floor
during the nights boats are in use. These changes reduce the chances for assaults,
provide plenty of space between boats so there is less chance of those inmates
disturbing one another, and make nighttime medical evaluations and medicine
distribution much more efficient.
Lastly, the parties agreed to hire an expert, Dr. Austin, as the Court’s expert. Dr.
Austin will be charged with evaluating the classification system presently in use and
the release programs authorized by the proposed settlement. Dr. Austin will make
recommendations to the Court.
VII.
Why Settlement is Fair, Reasonable, and Adequate
The settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate because it addresses the
overcrowding issues raise by Major Ketteman’s letter declaring an overcrowding
emergency from June 14, 2017, and assures that no Eighth Amendment violations will
occur.
The use of boats is limited by the agreement. For Population Inmates, they must
be separated into the larger pods and the number of boats in each pod is limited.
Population Inmates are evaluated prior to being assigned to boats to make certain they
10
suffer no physical impairment, thus, making boat use difficult or impossible. The
separation and numbering system for boats addresses the concerns about medical
observation, medical care, and distribution of medication. The additional staffing, boat
assignment through the classification system and separation of boats into separate pods
reduces the likelihood of inmate-on-inmate assaults. The existing release programs can
continue and additional release programs are in place, should the inmate population
exceed the limit set by the formula delineated in the settlement agreement. If all release
programs fail to solve the overcrowding problem, the sheriff is authorized to stop
admitting inmates and seek further guidance from this Court. Lastly, in independent
expert for the Court will evaluate the classification system and release programs to
make further recommendations concerning the jail population.
VII.
Objectors
On June 12, 2018, the following inmates testified about the conditions in the
Hamilton County Justice Center and the proposed settlement agreement:
Michael Hassan, filed a grievance but was not present at the hearing, and
therefore, the Court took his grievance under submission but found it was not
meritorious to the settlement;
Adam Lambert, transported from the jail in Butler County, Ohio, informed the
court of the costs to house inmates in other Ohio counties, and articulated
concerns regarding the disparity between the Butler County jail versus the
Hamilton County Justice Center (e.g., access to telephones, social services,
11
medication, and attorneys). The Court found that this objection was insufficient
to defeat approval of the settlement agreement as conditions at the Butler County
Jail were not included in this litigation;
Eric Jackson informed the Court about his concerns with maintaining and
securing personal property for inmates who are assigned to boats. The Court
found that the settlement agreement is reasonably designed to alleviate this
issue;
Antwaun Gilden informed the Court of his personal experiences and overall
concerns with inadequacy of medical care and classification with other inmates
who have immune deficiency viruses (e.g., HIV) in the Hamilton County Justice
Center. The Court found that the settlement agreement is reasonably designed to
avoid such classification problems;
Justin Jones informed the Court of his personal experiences and concerns about
sleeping on boats, maintaining his property, and sleeping among unsanitary
conditions (i.e., near other Population Inmates on boats who are detoxing or ill).
The Court found that the settlement agreement is reasonably designed to such
problems; and
DeVonte Banks informed the Court about his personal experiences and concerns
about sleeping on boats and the unsanitary conditions surrounding those who
are assigned to boats. The Court found that the settlement agreement is
reasonably designed to such problems.
VIII. Monetary Compensation
12
There is no monetary award to the Class members or Class representatives.
Plaintiff Robinson was awarded $ 5,000 as compensation on Count II of the Complaint,
an individual cause of action.
IX.
Attorneys' Fees
The parties agree that the statuary pay rate for attorneys involved in prison
litigation is $ 210.00 per hour. The parties further agreed that the totals calculated below
are fair, reasonable, and adequate:
Marc Mezibov has 10.5 hours = $ 2,205.00.
Michael O’Hara has 113 hours plus $ 23.60 in expenses = $ 23,0753.60.
Robert Newman has 230.10 hours =$ 48,321.00.
ORDER
Based upon the consideration of the above findings, it is the Order of this Court
that the proposed settlement of the above captioned case is fair, reasonable, and
adequate.
It is the Further Order of the Court that the proposed settlement is adopted by
this Court and shall bind Sheriff Neil and the Class members.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Susan J. Dlott_____________
Susan J. Dlott
United States District Court
13
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?