Thompson v. US Attorney General et al

Filing 9

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge(Doc. 7); and Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution.. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/27/19. (rrs)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION THOMPSON MARA MAGINDE, Petitioner, vs. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:17-cv-736 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 7) AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and, on December 13, 2018, submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7). No objections were filed. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) is ADOPTED; and 2. Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution. 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is TERMINATED in this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 2/27/19 s/ Timothy S. Black Timothy S. Black United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?