Lowe v. State of Ohio et al

Filing 6

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/21/18. (jlm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION HUBERT LOWE, Plaintiff, vs. STATE OF OHIO, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:18-cv-92 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on February 21, 2018, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 4). On March 9, 2018, Plaintiff filed a “motion to recant” indicating his acknowledgement of the fact that his claims are time barred and his desire to withdraw his claims. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the then-pending filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety. 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case shall be TERMINATED from the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 5/21/18 ________________________ ____________________ _ _ Timothy S. Black Timothy S. h United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?