Lowe v. State of Ohio et al
Filing
6
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/21/18. (jlm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
HUBERT LOWE,
Plaintiff,
vs.
STATE OF OHIO, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 1:18-cv-92
Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz
DECISION AND ENTRY
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4)
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to
United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the
Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on February 21, 2018,
submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 4). On March 9, 2018, Plaintiff filed a
“motion to recant” indicating his acknowledgement of the fact that his claims are time
barred and his desire to withdraw his claims.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo
all of the then-pending filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the
Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby
ADOPTED in its entirety.
1
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 3) is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly,
whereupon this case shall be TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 5/21/18
________________________
____________________
_
_
Timothy S. Black
Timothy S.
h
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?