Khamisi v. State Of Ohio et al
Filing
3
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of theMagistrate Judge (Doc. 2) be, and it hereby is, adopted as thefindings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court;petitioners Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE torefiling after petitioner has exhausted all available statecourt remedies. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 04/06/2018. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-cv-111(WOB-KLL)
KIMBERLY KHAMISI
PETITIONER
VS.
JUDGMENT
STATE OF OHIO, ET AL
This
matter
is
RESPONDENTS
before
the
Court
on
the
Report
and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 2),
and no objections having been filed thereto, and the Court being
sufficiently advised,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge (Doc. 2) be, and it hereby is, adopted as the
findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court;
petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to
refiling after petitioner has exhausted all available state
court remedies. A certificate of appealability shall not issue
with respect to the claims alleged in the petition. Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any application by petitioner to proceed
on appeal in forma pauperis would be not be taken in “good
faith.”
This 6th day of April, 2018.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?