Khamisi v. State Of Ohio et al

Filing 3

JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of theMagistrate Judge (Doc. 2) be, and it hereby is, adopted as thefindings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court;petitioners Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE torefiling after petitioner has exhausted all available statecourt remedies. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 04/06/2018. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-cv-111(WOB-KLL) KIMBERLY KHAMISI PETITIONER VS. JUDGMENT STATE OF OHIO, ET AL This matter is RESPONDENTS before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 2), and no objections having been filed thereto, and the Court being sufficiently advised, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 2) be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling after petitioner has exhausted all available state court remedies. A certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to the claims alleged in the petition. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any application by petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis would be not be taken in “good faith.” This 6th day of April, 2018.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?