McDougald v. Erdos et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 5/15/18. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff's claims against defendants Erdos and Cool are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). Case number 1:18-cv-135 is consolidated into case number 1:18-cv-93. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Jerone McDougald, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:18cv135 Jeremy Eaches, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on April 16, 2018 (Doc. 8. Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Erdos and Cool are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). Case number 1:18-cv-135 is consolidated into case number 1:18-cv-93. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?