Mimms v. Ware et al
Filing
12
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 11 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/21/18. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
JAMES DONALD MIMMS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
LINCOLN WARE, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 1:18-cv-185
Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz
DECISION AND ENTRY
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 11)
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United
States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate
Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court, and, on October 4, 2018, submitted a
Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 11). No objections were filed.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all
of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does
determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED
in its entirety. Accordingly:
1.
The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) is ADOPTED;
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 8) is DENIED; and
3.
Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the complaint (Doc. 10) is DENIED
as MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date:
11/21/2018
s/ Timothy S. Black
Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?