Burfitt v. Erving et al

Filing 12

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 8 Report and Recommendation denying 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 6/21/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Lawrence R. Burfitt, II Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:18cv260 C/O M. Erving, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on May 3, 2018 (Doc. 8). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s excessive-force claims against defendants Erving, Ruckel, Parish, Esaum, Buroughton, Sparks, and Warren and plaintiff’s failure-to-protect claims against defendant Nolan shall remain pending. Plaintiff’s Motions for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 5, 6) are DENIED. 1 Any request for certificate of appealability or request to certify an appeal would not be taken in good faith and would be denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?