Collins v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 29

DECISION AND ENTRY adopting Report and Recommendations re 27 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/3/2021. (rrs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION MACHELLE COLLINS, Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:18-cv-268 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 27) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on November 20, 2020, submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27). Plaintiff Machelle Collins filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on November 23, 2020. (Doc. 28). As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing and careful review of Plaintiff’s objections, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. On April 20, 2020, the Magistrate Judge recommended that this Court grant Defendant’s motion to remand Plaintiff’s case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative pleadings. (Doc. 21). No objections to that Report and Recommendation were filed. On June 16, 2020, this Court: (1) adopted the April 20, 2020 Report and Recommendation; (2) granted Defendant’s motion for an order reversing the Commissioner’s final decision pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and for remand; (3) remanded Plaintiff’s case to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation; and, (4) terminated the case on the docket of this Court. (Doc. 21). Three months later, on September 18, 2020, Plaintiff filed an opposition to this Court’s Decision and Entry remanding the case. (Doc. 25). A week later, Plaintiff filed a response in opposition (Doc. 26) to Defendant’s motion to remand (Doc. 18). The Magistrate Judge liberally considered Plaintiff’s pleadings as both a motion to alter/amend judgment and a motion for relief from judgment, and submitted the Report and Recommendation at issue in this Decision and Entry. (Doc. 27). The Magistrate Judge recommended denying Plaintiff’s request. (Id.) Plaintiff timely filed objections. (Doc. 28). However, this Court finds that Plaintiff’s objections are not well-taken. Construing Plaintiff’s objections liberally, Plaintiff argues that the record before the Court indicates that she is eligible for Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”). (Doc. 28 at 1). Thus, Plaintiff contends that this Court should not have terminated her action before this Court. (Doc. 28). However, terminating Plaintiff’s action before this Court was not a determination of Plaintiff’s eligibility for SSDI. The remand of Plaintiff’s case to the Commissioner reversed the prior, final decision of the Commissioner, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and sent Plaintiff’s 2 case back to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s April 20, 2020 Report and Recommendation. Thus, Plaintiff’s objections are not well-taken. Accordingly, for the reasons stated above: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) is hereby ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 28) are hereby OVERRULED; 3. Plaintiff’s motion opposing remand, construed as a motion to alter/amend judgment and/or motion for relief from judgment (Doc. 25) is DENIED; and, 4. The Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore Plaintiff is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 5/3/2021 s/Timothy S. Black Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?