Haywood v. Fri et al
Filing
18
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION in its entirety. Petitioner's case is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. This case is TERMINATED from the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 10/3/18. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
DAYMOND HAYWOOD,
Petitioner,
vs.
C/O FRI, et al.,
Respondent.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 1:18-cv-361
Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman
DECISION AND ENTRY
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 3) AND
TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United
States Magistrate Judge Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge
reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on August 16, 2018, submitted a Report
and Recommendation. (Doc. 3). No objections were filed.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo
all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does
determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in
its entirety.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:
1) Petitioner’s case is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.
2) The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is
TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date:
10/3/18
Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?