Haywood v. Fri et al

Filing 20

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION in its entirety. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1), the complaint (Doc. 1-1) is DISMISSED with prejudice, with the exception of Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Dunlap, Fri, Reiner, Kaut, Esham, and Cool. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
DAYMOND HAYWOOD,
Plaintiff,
vs.
C/O FRI, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Case No. 1:18-cv-361
Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman

DECISION AND ENTRY
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4)
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United
States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the
Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on June 20, 2018,
submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 4). No objections were filed.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo
all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does
determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in
its entirety.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:
1) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1), the complaint (Doc.
1-1) is DISMISSED with prejudice, with the exception of Plaintiff’s Eighth
Amendment claims against Defendants Dunlap, Fri, Reiner, Kaut, Esham, and
Cool.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date:

10/3/18

Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge

2