Smith v. Warden, London Correctional Institute

Filing 30

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 29 ), ADMINISTRATIVELY STAYING THE CASE, AND TERMINATING CASE FROM ACTIVE DOCKET. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 10/23/2020. (kaf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Case: 1:19-cv-00298-MWM-KLL Doc #: 30 Filed: 10/23/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 1415 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION – CINCINNATI MAURICE SMITH, Petitioner, vs. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent. Case No. 1:19-cv-298 : : : : : : : : : : : Judge Matthew W. McFarland Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 29), ADMINISTRATIVELY STAYING THE CASE, AND TERMINATING CASE FROM ACTIVE DOCKET The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 29), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO By: /s/ Matthew W. McFarland b JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?