Thurmond v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 31

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 28 ): The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman (Doc. 28 ), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for F ailure to Prosecute (Doc. 23 ) is hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 06/03/2021. (kaf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI DENISE THURMOND, Plaintiff, Case No. l:19-cv-955 Judge Matthew W. McFarland V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 28) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman (Doc. 28), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (Doc. 23) is hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO By:J,{�¥� JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?