Mackey v. AT&T

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING #17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation doc. #17 , accordingly this case is DISMISSED with prejudice for want of prosecution. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 4/1/2021. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Case: 1:20-cv-00588-TSB-KLL Doc #: 18 Filed: 04/01/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 169

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
EBONY MACKEY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
AT&T,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Case No. 1:20-cv-588
Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 17)
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United
States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate
Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, February 1, 2021, filed a Report
and Recommendation, recommending that this case be dismissed with prejudice for want
of prosecution. (Doc. 17). No objections were filed.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all
of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court finds that the
Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:
1.

The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) is ADOPTED;

2.

This case is DISMISSED with prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and

Case: 1:20-cv-00588-TSB-KLL Doc #: 18 Filed: 04/01/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 170

3.

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is
TERMINATED upon the docket of this Court.

4.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the Court certifies that an appeal of this
Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, the Court DENIES
Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 4/1/2021
Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge

2