Cox et al v. Nord et al

Filing 22

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 20 ): This action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b) and 1915(e)(2). Furthermore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), it is hereby certified that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and that Plaintiff should be denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 11/15/2023. (kaf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

GREGORY C. COX JR., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

Case No. l:23-cv-324
Judge Matthew W. McFarland

V.

PROSECUTOR STEVEN NORD, et al.,
Defendants.

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 20)

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 20), to whom this case is referred pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and the time for filing such
objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS said Report
and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with
prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b) and 1915(e)(2). Furthermore, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(a), it is hereby certified that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in
good faith and that Plaintiff should be denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT

By: ~ ; [ ~ ~ ~
JUDGE MATTHEW W.

McARLAND