Miller v. Hudson

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 8/28/2024. (kkz)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
John Holsen Miller,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 1:24cv401

George Hudson,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed
by the Magistrate Judge on August 5, 2024 (Doc. 5).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C),
including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file
objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th
Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 5) have been filed and
the time to do so has expired.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 5) of the Magistrate Judge is
hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the
complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett
Michael R. Barrett, Judge
United States District Court

1