Owner Operator Independent Drivers Association Inc et al v. Comerica Bank
Filing
136
ORDER on Plaintiff's request for in camera inspection re 132 Order, Set Deadlines/Hearings. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 10/19/2011. (cw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT
DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, CARL HARP
and MICHAEL WISE, as Representatives
of the Class and THE CERTIFIED CLASS
OF OWNER-OPERATORS, Case No.
C2-97-740 United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio,
Plaintiffs,
v.
COMERICA BANK,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 05 -CV-0056
JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY
Magistrate Judge King
ORDER
Pursuant to this Court’s October 5, 2011, Order, Plaintiffs have submitted documents to
the Court requesting in camera inspection. Having completed its review of the materials, the
Court has determined the following:
1. The Court finds the following documents, to be privileged, and should not be
produced:
a.
(1) Biannual Litigation Reports by the Cullen Law Firm to the OOIDA Board of
Directors from 2002-2011: All documents in this set are privileged.
b.
(2) An email from counsel to OOIDA dated Aug. 17, 1998 regarding plaintiffs’
appellate strategy in the Arctic and Prime appeals: All documents are privileged.
c.
(3) Two (2) fax communications from OOIDA’s counsel to OOIDA regarding
correspondence from Arctic’s counsel: All documents are privileged.
d.
(4) Four (4) written communications between attorneys with the Cullen Firm and
OOIDA regarding the Arctic Court’s grant of class certification: Documents 3
and 4 (pp. 4-7) are privileged. Produce documents 1 and 2 (pp. 1-3).
e.
(5) Communications between OOIDA and its cunsel regarding settlement of the
Arctic and Comerica cases: Privileged, except for the letters between Arctic
counsel and lawyers from The Cullen Law Firm within documents 3, 4, 5, and 6
of this set. Produce the letters between opposing counsel discussing settlement
(but redact any headings of faxes sent between lawyer and client).
f.
(6) Three (3) legal memoranda from OOIDA’s counsel to OOIDA regarding
bankruptcy matters: All documents are privileged.
g.
(7) Communications between OOIDA and its counsel regarding the identity of
Arctic class members and the distributions of Arctic settlement checks to class
members: All documents in this set are privileged.
h.
(8) Communications between OOIDA and its counsel regarding contempt
proceedings against defendants in the Arctic case: Pages 1-6; 2-22; and 24-26 are
privileged. Produce the remainder, subject to redactions listed below.
i.
(9) Six (6) e-mail communications from OOIDA’s counsel to OOIDA regarding
(a) the Court’s denial of Comerica’s motion to dismiss; (b) Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief
in Support of Summary Judgment; © the Court’s grant of summary judgment to
Comerica; and (d) the Sixth Circuit’s ruling: Pages 1-9 are privileged. Produce
the remainder.
j.
(10) Communications between OOIDA and its counsel responsive to Comerica’s
October 7, 2011, Request for Production propounded upon OOIDA: All
documents are privileged.
2. The court finds portions of the following documents to be privileged. Plaintiffs are
directed to redact the following portions, and then produce the documents forthwith:
a.
(8) Communications between OOIDA and its counsel regarding contempt
proceedings against defendants in the Arctic case:
i.
p. 16, redact the top portion (email between J. Mayers and Jim Johnston;
Karen England, and Tammy Hodges). Produce the remainder.
ii.
p. 23, redact the top portion (email between J. Mayers and Coral Beach).
Produce the remainder.
3. All other remaining documents shall be produced in full forthwith.
2
This order supersedes all previous orders in this case to the extent previous orders are
inconsistent with this order.
The parties shall address questions about this order to the Court's Law Clerk, Robert
Haferd, at 614-719-3262, by way of a telephone conference with counsel for all parties
participating, or with fewer than all counsel participating with express permission of nonparticipating counsel.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Algenon L. Marbley
ALGENON L. MARBLEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DATED: October 19, 2011
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?