Inhalation Plastics, Inc. v. Medex Cardio-Pulmonary, Inc.
Filing
358
ORDER adopting 357 the Report and Recommendation; Defendant's motion for attorneys' fees and taxation of costs is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as prematurely filed. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 12/20/16. (jk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Inhalation Plastics, Inc.,
Plaintiff,
V.
Medex Cardio-Pulmonary, Inc., et a!..
Case No. 2:07-cv-116
Defendants.
Medex Cardlo-Pulmonary, Inc.,
Counter-Claimant,
V.
Judge Michael H. Watson
Inhalation Plastics, Inc., et al.,
Counter-Defendants.
ORDER
On December 1,2016, Magistrate Judge Joison Issued a Report and
Recommendation ("R&R") recommending the Court deny Defendants Medex
Cardlo-Pulmonary, Inc. Smith Medical ASD's amended motion for attorneys' fees
and taxation of costs, ECF No. 332, without prejudice as prematurely filed. R&R,
ECF No. 357.
The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
The R&R further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the
R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review
by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District
Court. R&R 7, ECF No. 357. The deadline for filing such objections has passed,
and no objections were filed.
Accordingly, the R&R is ADOPTED. Defendants' motion for attorneys'
fees and taxation of costs, ECF No. 332, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as
prematurely filed.
The Court will hold a status conference in this case on Tuesday, January
10,2017 at 10:00 a.m. Counsel are directed to confer with one another prior to
the status conference and be prepared to discuss with the Court: (1) what efforts
have been made toward resolving this case; (2) how the parties wish to proceed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?