Blevins v. County of Franklin, Ohio et al

Filing 8

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 6 MOTION to Dismiss be granted. Objections due w/in ten (10) days. Signed by Terence P Kemp on 1/8/2009. (kk2)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Wes Blevins, Plaintiff, v. County of Franklin, Ohio, et al., Defendants. : : : : : Case No. 2:08-cv-1113 JUDGE SARGUS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Two of the defendants, the County of Franklin and the Franklin County Board of Commissioners, have filed a motion to dismiss. They argue that the former entity is not subject to suit and the latter cannot be held liable for plaintiff's claims under what appears to be a respondeat superior theory. Plaintiff's time for responding to the motion has passed but he has not responded. The Court concludes that he does not oppose Therefore, it is recommended the dismissal of these two parties. that their motion to dismiss (#6) be granted. PROCEDURE ON OBJECTIONS If any party objects to this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within ten (10) days of the date of this Report, file and serve on all parties written objections to those specific proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made, together with supporting authority for the objection(s). A judge of this Court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. Upon proper objections, a judge of this Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made herein, may receive further evidence or may recommit this matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1). The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to have the district judge review the Report and Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. 947 (6th Cir. 1981). See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d /s/ Terence P. Kemp United States Magistrate Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?