Williamson v. American Mastiff Breeders Council et al
Filing
226
ORDER granting 225 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 4/29/14. (lvw1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Fredericka Wagner, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 2:08-CV-00431
JUDGE SMITH
Magistrate Judge Kemp
v.
Circle W Mastiffs, et al.,
Defendants.
Craig W. Williamson,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:09-CV-00172
JUDGE SMITH
Magistrate Judge Kemp
v.
American Mastiff Breeders
Council, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Based on previous rulings of this Court, the following claims remain pending in Case No.
2:09-cv-172: Plaintiff Craig Williamson’s claims for defamation and intentional interference
with a business relationship against Kevin Ware, Melanie Ware, American Mastiff Breeders
Council, LLC (“AMBC”), Sandy Berger, and Connie Hammond. The Court’s March 31, 2014
Opinion and Order directed Plaintiff to timely advise the Court as to whether he intends to
pursue the remaining claims. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiff
moves for an order dismissing with prejudice his Complaint against the remaining Defendants
(Doc. 225 in Case No. 2:09-cv-172). Plaintiff asserts that he has reached settlement agreements
with Sandy Berger, Kevin Ware, and Melanie Ware, and that he does not intend to pursue his
claims against either Connie Hammond or the AMBC. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS
Plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff’s remaining claims against Kevin Ware, Melanie Ware, the AMBC,
Sandy Berger, and Connie Hammond are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. No claim
remains pending in this matter, and the Clerk shall enter final judgment.
The Clerk shall remove Document 225 in Case No. 2:09-cv-172 from the Court’s
pending motions list.
The Clerk shall remove Case No. 2:09-cv-172 from the Court’s pending cases list.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ George C. Smith
GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?