Orrand et al v. West End Land Development, Inc.

Filing 33

ORDER denying 25 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 05/04/2010. (cw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION RAYMOND ORRAND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WEST END LAND DEVELOPMENT INC., et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant West End Land Development, Inc.'s ("Defendant") Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Counterclaims Without Prejudice (Dkt. 25). On April 29, 2009, Defendant filed its Counterclaims against Intervenor Plaintiff International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18's ("Intervenor Plaintiff"). Defendant now seeks to dismiss these counterclaims without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Intervenor Plaintiff opposes Defendant's Motion because of the effort and expense that have already been expended in this case. Namely, Intervenor Plaintiff has participated in the discovery process for Defendant's Counterclaims and has filed a dispositive motion (Dkt. 24). The decision whether to grant or deny a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) is in the discretion of the district court. Warfield v. Allied Signal TBS Holdings, Inc., 267 F.3d 538, 541 (6th Cir. 2001). This Court finds that dismissing the counterclaims without prejudice at this stage in the proceedings would result in prejudice to the Intervenor Plaintiff. See Grover v. Eli Lilly and Co., 33 F.3d 716, 718 (6th Cir. 1994) (courts consider, among other factors, the effort and expense by defendant and whether a motion for summary judgment has been filed by defendant). Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Counterclaims Without Prejudice Case No. C2-09-CV-0212 JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY Magistrate Judge King is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Algenon L. Marbley ALGENON L. MARBLEY United States District Court Judge DATED: May 4, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?