Enyart v. Karnes et al
Filing
146
ORDER granting 138 Motion to correct the case name. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 1/11/12. (rew)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
RICHARD E. ENYART, JR.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Civil Action 2:09-CV-687
Judge Smith
Magistrate Judge King
FRANKLIN COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Plaintiff has filed a motion to correct the case name, contending
that his original complaint, Doc. No. 2, and all of his subsequent
filings listed “Franklin County” as the first defendant, but that the
Court’s orders list “Sheriff Jim Karnes” as the first defendant.
No. 138, p. 1.
Doc.
While plaintiff “does not question the correctness of
the change [in the caption name] by the court as it is undoubtedly
well founded[,]” plaintiff does ask that the Court “issue an order
that all future pleadings relevant to the instant action contain the
case name as captioned above [Enyart v. Franklin County], and for good
cause contained herein.”
Id.
After reviewing the original complaint, Doc. No. 2, this Court
agrees that Franklin County was the first defendant listed in that
filing.
WHEREUPON, plaintiff’s motion to correct the case name, Doc. No.
138, is GRANTED.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to change the case caption on
the docket to reflect the first defendant named in the original
complaint, Doc. No. 2, i.e., Franklin County.
January 11, 2012
Date
s/Norah McCann King
Norah McCann King
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?