Thomas v. McDowell et al

Filing 60

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DISMISSING "Unnamed Madison Correctional Institution Medical Staff Members" as parties, without prejudice, pursuant to Civil Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge James L Graham on 10/18/11. (ds)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION SHAWN THOMAS, Plaintiff, Civil Action 2:10-cv-152 Judge James L. Graham Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers v. MR. McDOWELL, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of the August 5, 2011 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (ECF No. 39.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss the unnamed defendants from this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The Report and Recommendation specifically advises Plaintiff that the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report results in a “waiver of the right to de novo review . . . by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court.” (Report and Recommendation 8, ECF No. 39.) The time period for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 39.) Accordingly, the “Unnamed Madison Correctional Institution Medical Staff Members” are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4(m). IT IS SO ORDERED. S/ James L. Graham James L. Graham UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date: October 18, 2011 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?