Brown v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution, et al.
Filing
113
ORDER ADOPTING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 111 which DENIES 85 Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 12/28/11. (sem1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
YUSUF BROWN,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:10-cv-822
JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST
Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers
v.
WARDEN ROSS CORRECTIONAL
INSTITUTION, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the United States Magistrate Judge’s
December 1, 2011 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 111.) The Magistrate Judge
recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of
Class Counsel. (ECF No. 85.)
The Report and Recommendation specifically advises Plaintiff that the failure to object to
the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report results in a “waiver of the
right to de novo review . . . by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment
of the District Court.” (ECF No. 111, at 4.) The time period for filing objections to the Report
and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and
Recommendation.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections
have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the
Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 111.) Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s
Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel. (ECF No. 85.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Gregory L. Frost
GREGORY L. FROST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?