Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. Ohio Building Restoration Co.

Filing 28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 21 Motion for Contempt & 27 MOTION to Continue Contempt Hearing: If plaintiff does not reach an understanding with the defendant about complying with the Court's orders w/in ten (10) days, it is recommended that the defendant be found in contempt & that an arrest warrant issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 3/26/2012. (kk2)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Boards of Trustees of the Ohio : Laborers’ Fringe Benefit Programs, : Plaintiffs, : v. Case No. 2:10-cv-1032 : Ohio Building Restoration Co., : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY Magistrate Judge Kemp Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On January 26, 2012, plaintiffs moved for an order to show cause why defendant should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with the Court's order of January 6, 2012, ordering defendant to appear for deposition, answer interrogatories and produce documents. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation. Defendant and its corporate officer Duane Haas were ordered appear on March 19, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. to show cause why a finding of contempt should not be made. with the notice, they did not appear. Despite being served However, an attorney for the defendant had made some contact with plaintiffs’ counsel prior to the hearing. Plaintiff requested ten days within which to attempt to reach an understanding with defendant about complying with the Court’s orders. If that does not occur, it is recommended that the defendant be found in contempt and that an arrest warrant issue. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Report and Recommendation to the defendant by regular and certified mail. /s/ Terence P. Kemp__________ United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?