Bloodworth v. Timmerman-Cooper et al

Filing 75

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 58 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 72 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiffs claims against defendant Debora Timmerman-Cooper are DISMISSED; plaintiffs remaining equal protect ion claims (Counts V, VII, VIII, X and XIV) are DISMISSED; and the retaliation claim in Count XVI and plaintiffs request for injunctive relief demanding his return to the London Correctional Institution are DISMISSED. In all other respects, defendants motion to dismiss isDENIED. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 2/13/2012. (cw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
RONALD BLOODWORTH,
Plaintiff,
vs.

Civil Action 2:10-CV-1121
Judge Marbley
Magistrate Judge King

WARDEN DEBORA A. TIMMERMAN-COOPER,
et al.,
Defendant.
ORDER
On January 19, 2012, the United states Magistrate Judge recommended
that defendants’ motion to dismiss, Doc. No. 58, be granted in part and
denied in part.

Order and Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 72.

Although the parties were advised of their right to object to the
recommendation, and of the consequences of their failure to do so, there
has nevertheless been no objection.
The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 72, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Doc. No. 58, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED
IN PART.

In particular, plaintiff’s claims against defendant Debora

Timmerman-Cooper are DISMISSED; plaintiff’s remaining equal protection
claims

(Counts

V,

VII,

VIII,

X

and

XIV)

are

DISMISSED;

and

the

retaliation claim in Count XVI and plaintiff’s request for injunctive
relief demanding his return to the London Correctional Institution are
DISMISSED.

In all other respects, defendants’ motion to dismiss is

DENIED.
s/Algenon L. Marbley
Algenon L. Marbley
United States District Judge