Dodson v. Banks et al
Filing
21
ORDER granting 18 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; adopting 19 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 2/11/13. (jk1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Charles Lewis Dodson,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:11-cv-164
v.
Judge Michael H. Watson
Warden Edward Banks, eta/.,
Defendants.
ORDER
On January 17,2013, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers, to whom
this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 )(B) and General Order
95-2 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division of Columbus, filed a
Report and Recommendation concerning the disposition of Charles Lewis
Dodson's ("Plaintiff') complaint in this prisoner civil rights case. The Report and
Recommendation recommended granting Defendants' motion for judgment on
the pleadings, ECF No. 18, and dismissing Plaintiffs complaint, ECF No. 3.
The Report and Recommendation notified the parties of their right to file
objections to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)
and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b ). The Report and Recommendation
further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the Report and
Recommendation within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de
novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the
District Judge adopting the Report and Recommendation. Report and
Recommendation 3, ECF No. 19. The deadline for filing such objections was
January 31, 2013, and no objections were filed.
Having received no objections, the Report and Recommendation is
adopted. Judgment on the pleadings is granted for Defendants, ECF No. 18, and
Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. The Clerk shall enter final judgment and
terminate the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
~.Wcrk
M(CHAELH:WfSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?