Dodson v. Banks et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting 18 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; adopting 19 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 2/11/13. (jk1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Charles Lewis Dodson, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:11-cv-164 v. Judge Michael H. Watson Warden Edward Banks, eta/., Defendants. ORDER On January 17,2013, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 )(B) and General Order 95-2 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division of Columbus, filed a Report and Recommendation concerning the disposition of Charles Lewis Dodson's ("Plaintiff') complaint in this prisoner civil rights case. The Report and Recommendation recommended granting Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings, ECF No. 18, and dismissing Plaintiffs complaint, ECF No. 3. The Report and Recommendation notified the parties of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b ). The Report and Recommendation further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Judge adopting the Report and Recommendation. Report and Recommendation 3, ECF No. 19. The deadline for filing such objections was January 31, 2013, and no objections were filed. Having received no objections, the Report and Recommendation is adopted. Judgment on the pleadings is granted for Defendants, ECF No. 18, and Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. The Clerk shall enter final judgment and terminate the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. ~.Wcrk M(CHAELH:WfSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?