United States of America v. Fifteen Thousand Eight Hundred Forty and 00/100 Dollars ($15,840.00) in United States Currency et al
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and GRANTING Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 12-19-11. (ga)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action 2:11-cv-00219
Judge George C. Smith
Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers
v.
FIFTEEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED
FORTY AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($15,840.00)
IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the November 15, 2011 Report and
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 22.) The Magistrate Judge recommended
that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Strike Answer of Matthew Hughes.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge specifically advised the parties
that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days results in a “waiver
of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment
of the District Court.” (Report & Recommendation 3, ECF No. 22.) The time period for filing
objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. No party has objected to the Report
and Recommendation.
The Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired,
the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly,
Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike is GRANTED. (ECF No. 21.) Mr. Hughes’ Answer is hereby
STRICKEN from the record. (ECF No. 9.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ George C. Smith
GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?