Alig-Mielcarek v. Jackson et al

Filing 32

ORDER denying without prejudice 30 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 6/22/2011. (kjm1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JANA M. ALIG-MIELCAREK, Ph.D., Plaintiff, Civil Action 2:11-cv-00255 Judge Edmund A. Sargus Magistrate Judge E.A. Preston Deavers v. DERRELL L. JACKSON, Ed.D., et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 30). For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The docket fails to indicate that prior to seeking a default judgment, Plaintiff first obtained an entry of default as contemplated by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). An entry of default is distinct from entry of a default judgment. See O.J. Distrib., Inc. v. Hornell Brewing Co., Inc., 340 F.3d 345, 353 (6th Cir. 2003); S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 55.1(b). By asking only for a default judgment, Plaintiff has failed to follow the sequential procedure set forth in Rule 55. See Brantley v. Runyon, No. C-1-96-842, 1997 WL 373739, at *1 (S.D. Ohio June 19, 1997) (“In order to obtain a default judgment under Rule 55(b)(2), there must first be an entry of default as provided by Rule 55(a).” (citation omitted)). For this additional reason, the Court cannot enter a default judgment under Rule 55(b) at this juncture. Cf. O.J. Distrib., Inc., 340 F.3d . at 352 (“‘Rule 55 permits the clerk to enter a default when a party fails to defend an action as required. The court may then enter default judgment.’” (emphasis added)) (quoting Weiss v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 283 F.3d 790, 794 (6th Cir. 2002)). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 30) WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: June 22, 2011 /s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?