Younker v. Ohio State University Medical Center et al

Filing 111

ORDER ADOPTING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 109 in that 90 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 7/16/13. (sem1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AARON D. YOUNKER, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:11-cv-00749 Judge Gregory L. Frost Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers v. OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation filed on June 25, 2013. (ECF No. 109.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 90) be granted for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. The Report and Recommendation specifically advises Plaintiff that the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report results in a “waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court.” (Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 109 at PageID# 517.) See, e.g., Pfahler v. Nat’l Latex Prod. Co., 517 F.3d 816, 829 (6th Cir. 2007). The time period for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the 1 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 90) and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Gregory L. Frost GREGORY L. FROST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?