In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

Filing 1259

SECOND NOTICE REGARDING PRIVATE AUTOPSY OF GARY OTTE - In light of Defendants Reply, the last sentence of the Notice (There is nothing pending for the Court to decide about the autopsy results and the Court will do nothing on this matterexcept pursu ant to a motion by one of the parties.) is WITHDRAWN. Because it asks for a court order, the Reply will be treated as a motion to compel. Because of the urgency of preparation for the Tibbetts-Campbell preliminary injunction hearing, Plaintiffs may f ile their memorandum in opposition to the motion not later than September 29, 2017, at 4:00 p.m. No further briefing will be considered on this issue in the absence of court permission on good causeshown re 1258 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 9/26/17. (kma)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION, Case No. 2:11-cv-1016 Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz This Order relates to All Plaintiffs SECOND NOTICE REGARDING PRIVATE AUTOPSY OF GARY OTTE This case is before the Court on Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 1258) to Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Request for Autopsy Results (ECF No. 1254). Defendants’ Reply was docketed within seconds of the Court’s Notice Regarding Private Autopsy of Gary Otte (ECF No. 1257). In light of Defendants’ Reply, the last sentence of the Notice (“There is nothing pending for the Court to decide about the autopsy results and the Court will do nothing on this matter except pursuant to a motion by one of the parties.”) is WITHDRAWN. Because it asks for a court order, the Reply will be treated as a motion to compel. Because of the urgency of preparation for the Tibbetts-Campbell preliminary injunction hearing, Plaintiffs may file their memorandum in opposition to the motion not later than September 29, 2017, at 4:00 p.m.. No 1 further briefing will be considered on this issue in the absence of court permission on good cause shown. September 26, 2017. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?