Hurst v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al

Filing 97

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 3/26/14. (lvw1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

MARK EDWARD HURST,
Plaintiff,

vs.

Case No.: 2:11-cv-1090
JUDGE SMITH
Magistrate Judge King

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION
AND CORRECTION, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
On February 19, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be denied and
that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel is denied. The parties were specifically advised of their right
to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so.
There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation.
The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiff’s
Motions (Docs. 78 and 84) are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ George C. Smith__________________
GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT