Great Northern Insurance Company et al v. Brentlinger Enterprises et al
Filing
31
PROTECTIVE ORDER: in re discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 3/25/13. (sh1)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE
COMPANY, et al.,
Plaintiffs
vs.
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, et al.
Defendants.
) Case No.: 2:11-cv-01153-ALM-MRA
)
) Judge Algenon L. Marbley
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PROTECTIVE ORDER
NOW on this 22 day of March , 2013, for good cause shown and with the consent of the
parties, it is hereby ordered and the parties hereby stipulate as follows:
1.
The purpose of this Stipulated Protective Order (the “Protective Order”) is to
facilitate expeditious discovery and exchange of information and documents in the above
captioned action (hereinafter the “Action”) and protect the interests of all Parties’ confidential
and commercially-sensitive information and documents.
2.
This Protective Order shall govern the handling of documents, deposition
exhibits, portions of any marked deposition transcripts, interrogatory responses, admissions,
electronic data and any other information (hereinafter “information”) produced, governed or
exchanged by and among any person or entity, whether a party or a nonparty (hereinafter
“person”) and whether acting on its own or through counsel to the Action.
3.
The information contained or disclosed in material that has been designated as
“Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” in accordance with this Protective
Order shall be referred to as “Protected Information.” Protected Information shall be used solely
for the purpose of this action (including any appeals), and not in any other litigation, and not for
any business or other purpose whatsoever.
4.
Information containing trade secrets, proprietary research, product research and
development, product design and manufacturing, or commercial or business information may be
designated as confidential. A party may designate any other information as “Confidential” if the
party believes in good faith that there is good cause to treat the information as confidential.
5.
Information may be marked “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” only when a
party reasonably believes that it contains proprietary and/or confidential information so sensitive
that disclosure of such information to persons other than counsel and their non-party experts is
likely to harm the designating person(s).
6.
Protected
Information
shall
be
prominently
marked
“Confidential”
or
“Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only” by the disclosing party prior to furnishing such
information.
To designate any electronic information as confidential, a party shall stamp
“Confidential” or Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” on the media on which the electronic
information is produced, and any such designation will apply to the electronic content contained
on that media.
7.
If a party inadvertently fails to designate Protected Information as “Confidential”
or “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” when that information is produced, disclosed, or
otherwise provided in this litigation, the party shall give notice to the other parties of the
inadvertent omission promptly upon discovery thereof. The information shall then be treated as
if the designation of “Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” had been made
when the Protected Information was first produced, disclosed or otherwise provided in this
litigation.
2
8.
Information subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege or work product
immunity inadvertently or mistakenly produced shall in no way prejudice or otherwise constitute
a waiver of, or estoppel as to, any claim of privilege or work-product immunity for such
information. Any person receiving information subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege or
work product immunity shall return the original and all copies of such information to the
disclosing party within ten (10) days after being notified of the inadvertent or mistaken
disclosure.
9.
Confidential information produced by third parties may also be marked
“Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” A party may designate Protected
Information produced by third parties as confidential by providing a log to the other Parties. The
log shall identify the Protected Information by Bates number, if available, or by description of
the information for which it claims confidentiality under this Protective Order. The Parties will
then prominently mark all such information in their possession as “Confidential” or
“Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” The designating party shall have thirty (30) days, which
may be extended by agreement, to provide the log.
10.
Counsel shall not furnish any document or disclose any information designated as
“Confidential” pursuant to this Protective Order except as provided herein:
a.
A party may, without any waiver of “Confidential” status, disclose to any
person “Confidential” information of which it is the source.
b.
A party may disclose “Confidential” information of which it is not the
source as follows:
i.
“Confidential” information may be used to take or defend
testimony at any deposition, hearing or trial in this action subject to
the requirements of paragraph 13.
ii.
“Confidential” information may be used in any oral or written
argument in the case, subject to the requirements of paragraph 14.
3
Any transcript of any oral argument referring to “Confidential”
information shall be made available only to persons qualified to
receive “Confidential” documents and information under this
Protective Order.
iii.
11.
“Confidential” information may be shown to any witness or
potential witness in interviews or in preparation for any deposition,
hearing or trial, and at any deposition, hearing or trial subject to the
requirements of paragraphs 11 and 13.
“Confidential” information may be disclosed to the following persons (hereinafter
“Qualified Persons”):
a.
b.
In-house counsel for any party to this Action and their associates,
paralegal, clerical or service support staff;
c.
Experts or consultants (including their employees and/or support staff)
retained by a party to this Action;
d.
Deponents or hearing witnesses and court reporters, in accordance with
paragraph 15.
e.
The court and its personnel;
f.
The parties;
g.
12.
Outside counsel subject to this Order for any party to this Action and their
associates, paralegal, clerical or service support staff;
Any person agreed to in writing by the parties.
Information stamped “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” and produced in this
Action may not be disclosed to any person other than those designated in subparagraphs 11(a),
11 (c), 11(d), 11(e) and 11 (g). A party may, without any waiver of “Confidential – Attorneys’
Eyes only” status, disclose to any person “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information of
which it is the source.
13.
Except as otherwise provided in this Protective Order, any disclosure or
dissemination of Protected Information shall be preceded by execution of a declaration in a form
4
substantially similar to the Declaration attached as “Exhibit A.” Each executed Declaration shall
be kept on file by counsel who obtained that Declaration and shall be available for inspection by
the Court or a party’s counsel upon good cause shown. Counsel of record shall exchange the
signed Declarations upon request at the conclusion of litigation.
While this Protective Order shall in all other respects apply to the following persons,
declarations shall not be required of:
a.
b.
14.
Counsel of record and legal, paralegal, clerical, secretarial, and other
persons employed by counsel of record for any party on a regular basis
and not solely for purposes of the instant litigation;
The parties, or their employees, officers, and directors, to the extent such
disclosure pertains to “Confidential” information only and is necessary for
the carrying out of their respective duties in connection with this litigation.
If it becomes necessary for a party to file Protected Information with the Court,
either directly or as a part of another paper, the party shall file a motion for leave to file the
documents under seal and file the documents according to Rule 79.3 of the Southern District of
Ohio Civil Rules.
15.
If a person believes that Protected Information belonging to it has been or may be
disclosed in the course of any deposition (whether through any question, answer, colloquy and/or
exhibit), then such person may designate the deposition, portion thereof, or exhibit as
“Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” by (1) stating on the record of the
deposition that such deposition, portion thereof, or exhibit is “Confidential” or Confidential –
attorneys’ Eyes Only” or by (2) stating in a writing served on counsel for the other party, up to
thirty (30) days after receipt of such deposition transcript by the designating person, that such
deposition, portion thereof, or exhibit is “Confidential” or Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”
The deposition transcript and exhibits shall be treated as “Confidential” in accordance with the
5
provisions of this Protective Order until written designation is made or the time within which to
make such designation has expired. When a claim of confidentiality is made at any deposition,
all persons in attendance who, by virtue of the terms of this Protective Order, do not have access
to such Protected Information shall be excluded from attendance at the portion or portions of the
deposition at which such Protected Information will be or might be disclosed. If any deposition,
portions thereof, or exhibits are identified as “Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
Only,” then all originals, copies, and synopses thereof shall be marked in accordance with this
Protective Order. If all or part of a videotaped deposition is designated as confidential, the video
media shall be labeled “Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” Nothing in this
Protective Order shall be construed to limit the right of the producing person to use its Protected
Information for any purpose.
16.
The “Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” status of all
Protected Information shall survive the conclusion of this litigation. At the conclusion of this
litigation, everyone shall return that information (and all copies of that information) to the
designating counsel of record. The designating party shall pay any shipping costs incurred in
returning all information (and all copies of that information) at the conclusion of this Action.
Upon request, counsel of record shall certify in writing that they have complied with this
paragraph. Persons other than counsel of record to whom Protected Information has been
disclosed also shall certify in writing that they have complied with this paragraph upon request
by the designating party.
17.
Upon request, the designating party agrees to store any and all documentation
received from a party’s counsel for a specified time period, not to exceed seven (7) years from
the conclusion of the Action.
6
18.
Nothing in this Protective Order shall affect the right of any party to seek greater
protection than that provided for herein for any information including, but not limited to,
defenses or objections to the discovery or production of information, and to the use or
admissibility at trial of any evidence, whether or not comprise of information governed by this
Protective Order.
A party may seek relief from any of these provisions or challenge the
designation of confidentiality of any information by motion to this Court with notice and an
opportunity to be heard provided to all parties, and any third party producing such information.
19.
If a party objects to another party’s designation of Protected Information, it shall
advise the designating party in writing of the reasons for the objection, and the designating party
shall have fifteen (15) days to review the matter. The party objecting shall attach a copy of the
Protected Information subject to challenge or shall identify such information by production
number or other appropriate designation and shall set forth in detail the reason for the objection.
If the designating party decides to retain the “Confidential” or Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
Only” designation, the objecting party may move for an order to remove the designation. The
information at issue shall be treated as Protected Information until the Court rules on any such
motion. For good cause shown, the objecting party may ask the Court to shorten the time
periods allowed by this Paragraph.
20.
This Protective Order shall be binding on any future party to this litigation who
executes it.
21.
This Protective Order shall continue in force after the completion of this litigation
including, without limitation, any appeal therefrom.
22.
In entering into this Protective Order, the parties preserve all rights and objections
they may have in this lawsuit to the use of Protected Information.
7
23.
The provisions of this Protective Order may be modified upon written agreement
of the parties or upon application to this Court for good cause shown.
SO STIPULATED:
This ____ day of __________, 2013
Date: ___________________
Date: ___________________
Date: __________________
___________________________________
Paul R. Bartolacci
pbartolacci@cozen.com
Cozen O’Conner
1900 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Attorney for Plaintiffs
___________________________________
Jonathan W. Philipp
jonathan.philipp@zurichna.com
Philipp & Gregory
5005 Rockside Road
Suite 200
Independence, OH 44131
Attorney for Defendant Brentlinger Enterprises
___________________________________
Lawrence A. Sutter (0042664)
John R. Conley (0084079)
Sutter O’Connell
3600 Erieview Tower
1301 E. 9th Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Phone: (216) 928-2200
Fax: (216) 928-4400
Attorneys for Defendants BMW of North America
and BMW AG
IT IS SO ORDERED:
s/Mark R. Abel
United States Magistrate Judge
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
) Case No.: 2:11-cv-01153-ALM-MRA
)
) Judge Algenon L. Marbley
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE
COMPANY, et al.,
Plaintiffs
vs.
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, et al.
Defendants.
NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
By signing below, I acknowledge and agree as follows:
1.
I have received and read a copy of the Protective Order entered by the United
States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division in this case.
2.
I agree to be bound by the terms of the Protective Order. I understand that
documents and information which are to be disclosed to me by counsel of record for
___________________________ (name of party) are to be used by me solely to assist such
counsel in prosecution or defense of claims involved in the action Great Northern Insurance
Company, et al. v. BMW of North America, et al. I further understand that a Protective Order
entered by the Court, a copy of which has been shown to me and which I have read, prohibits me
from either using such documents and information for any other purpose or disclosing such
documents
and
information
to
any
person
other
than
counsel
of
record
for
______________________ (name of party) or person assisting them, or to the Court via report,
deposition and/or testimony. In accepting disclosure of documents to me, I agree to be bound by
that Protective Order and submit to the jurisdiction of the Court for the purposes of its
9
enforcement. At the conclusion of the case, or my involvement in the case, should that occur
sooner, I will return all “Confidential” or “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information I
have to the attorney who provided it to me. Upon request, I will confirm in writing that I have
complied with the terms of the aforementioned Protective Order.
3.
I submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Ohio, for purposes of enforcement of this Non-Disclosure agreement and the
Protective Order.
________________, 2013
________________________________
Signature
________________________________
Printed Name
________________________________
Address
________________________________
Address
10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?