Fleming v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
ORDER adopting 17 the Report and Recommendation; Summary Judgment is GRANTED for Defendants, and Plaintiff's Complaint 3 , is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 11/27/12. (jk1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Konni Fleming,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:12-cv-198
v.
Judge Michael H. Watson
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
On October 31, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Abel, to whom this
case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(8) and General Order 95-2
for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division of Columbus, filed a Report and
Recommendation concerning the disposition of Konni Fleming's ("Plaintiff'')
Complaint in this Social Security case. The Report and Recommendation
recommended affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security
Administration and granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment.
The Report and Recommendation notified the parties of their right to file
objections to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)
and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b ). The Report and Recommendation
further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the Report and
Recommendation within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de
novo review by the District Judge. Report and Recommendation 16, ECF No.
17. The deadline for filing such objections was November 19, 2012, and no
objections were filed.
Having received no objections, the Report and Recommendation is
ADOPTED. Summary judgment is GRANTED for Defendants, and Plaintiff's
Complaint, ECF No.3, is DISMISSED. The Clerk shall enter final judgment in
this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Ml FIAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?