Lawson v. McQuate et al

Filing 63

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 5/8/14. (lvw1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JAMES HAROLD LAWSON, JR., Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 2:12-cv-533 JUDGE SMITH Magistrate Judge Abel JESSICA McQUATE, et al., Defendants. ORDER On February 18, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendants Jessica McQuate and Dino Cardaras’ November 13, 2013 Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 50) be GRANTED. (See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 55). The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation. This matter is now before the Court on Plaintiff Lawson’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation. (See Doc. 58). The Court will consider the matter de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The objections present the issues presented to and considered by the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff asserts that the record establishes a “wanton denial of proper medical care.” However, Plaintiff has failed to provide sufficient medical documentation. For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, this Court finds that the objections are without merit. The Report and Recommendation, Document 55, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Defendants Jessica McQuate and Dino Cardaras’ November 13, 2013 Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 50) is hereby GRANTED. The only remaining defendants in this action are John and Jane Doe. The Court hereby dismisses the claims against those defendants without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The Clerk shall remove Document 55 from the Court’s pending motions list and shall terminate this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ George C. Smith__________________ GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?