Paige v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 12

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION it is recommended that the joint motion re 11 be granted and that the action be remanded to the Commissioner. Objections to R&R due by 4/8/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 3/21/13. (rew)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LEONARD G. PAIGE, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action 2:12-cv-764 Judge Frost Magistrate Judge King CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The parties have jointly stipulated that the matter be remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. No. 11. It is RECOMMENDED that the joint motion to remand, Doc. No. 11, be granted and that the action be remanded to the Commissioner, pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings. If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve Recommendation, on all parties specifically objections designating to the this Report Report and and Recommendation, and the part thereof in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers, Local 231 etc., 829 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1987); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). s/Norah McCann King Norah McCann King United States Magistrate Judge March 21, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?