Paige v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Filing
12
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION it is recommended that the joint motion re 11 be granted and that the action be remanded to the Commissioner. Objections to R&R due by 4/8/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 3/21/13. (rew)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
LEONARD G. PAIGE,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Civil Action 2:12-cv-764
Judge Frost
Magistrate Judge King
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
ACTING COMMISSIONER
OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The parties have jointly stipulated that the matter be
remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. §
405(g).
Doc. No. 11.
It is RECOMMENDED that the joint motion to remand, Doc. No.
11, be granted and that the action be remanded to the Commissioner,
pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings.
If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this
Report and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days,
file
and
serve
Recommendation,
on
all
parties
specifically
objections
designating
to
the
this
Report
Report
and
and
Recommendation, and the part thereof in question, as well as the basis
for objection thereto.
28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after
being served with a copy thereof.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The parties are specifically advised that failure to object
to the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right
to de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the
decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation.
See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of
Teachers, Local 231 etc., 829 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1987); United States
v. Walters,
638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
s/Norah McCann King
Norah McCann King
United States Magistrate Judge
March 21, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?