Brown v. Mohr et al

Filing 239

ORDER denying 237 Motion to Compel; adopting and affirming 238 Report and Recommendations.; denying 231 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 231 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 11/7/18. (sh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION STEVEN S. BROWN, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 2:13-cv-006 JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH Magistrate Judge Ovington DIRECTOR MOHR, et aL, Defendants. ORDER On October 19,2018, the United States Magistrate Judge issued an Orderand Report and Recommendation denying Plaintiffs Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Motion for Extension of Time and Recommending that Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction he denied. (Doc. 238). The parties were advised of their right to object to the Order and Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to this Orderand Report and Recommendation. The Orderand Report and Recommendation, Document 238, is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiffs Motions to Compel, for Appointment of Counsel and for an Extension ofTime (Doc. 237) are DENIED. Further, Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 231) is DENIED. The Clerk shall remove Documents 231,237, and 238 from the Court's pending motions list. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Georse C. Smith GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?